> can generate fully [...] parametric 3D geometry.

This is obviously a lie without even testing it. STEP files do not have any sort of support for parametric features.

> SGS-1 outputs are accurate and can be edited easily in traditional CAD software.

I tested this on their own demo file to give it its best chance at working correctly and this claim they've made is just a complete lie. I've included the input and output for comparison below next to a correct part I modelled myself[1][2] and a list of errors. These aren't just incorrect dimensions but broken features that make these very hard to edit.

I don't know why they'd lie about this and them provide a demo the shows they're lying with their own input files, and even text on their own page which makes a claim that can not be true based solely on the information further down that page. Is it to get news headlines? Do they want to sell this to people that don't know any better? Is this simply just another case of CS people thinking they've solved a problem without having any domain knowledge to know their claims are nonsense?

- Every dimension is wrong aside from the one that I corrected to get the same scale (there doesn't appear to be any correct relative to each-other which is why I just picked one at random)

- One hole doesn't go all the way through

- The closest hole isn't round (it's two holes with slightly different diameters that overlap with a sum larger than either hole)

- The fillets are not fillets

- The top hole is offset

- The front chamfer goes down past the base

- The not-fillets don't have the same radius

- The two top holes are offset from each other in Z

- The front chamfer is joined to the circle in different ways on each side (to be fair the drawing is nonsensical here, I just went for a tangent with the circle on my part)

- Much more that I've probably missed

[1]: https://files.catbox.moe/mzb9bb.png

[2]: https://files.catbox.moe/5xkna1.png

Spectral Labs releases SGS-1: the first generative model for structured CAD