Read what I wrote, and reread it again. I don't think you understood what I said.

What I'm positing is that the crux of the issue with the Western crop of South Asia is that it is hagiographic in nature, not quantitative.

My argument is an institutionalist and political economy approach to studying historical and contemporary South Asia solves most of the problem.

This was what John Fairbanks argued back in the 20th century that China studies needed to be quantitative and testable in nature, as he was an Intel officer posted in China during WW2. This was not the mainstream view on China studies and China history in the west until the late 2010s.

That said, anyone with this muscle isn't going to teach history in the West in 2026 unlike those who did something similar for China in the 1980s-2000s who made a new generation of China scholars who returned to China.

There is a new generation of India scholars who specialize in this (a number of whom trained under economists like Arvind Subramanian, Raghuram Rajan, etc) but most of these scholars either return to India to take positions at INIs and are thus not visible to Western academia) or (and this is the more common route) end up in the Policy space as the newer crop of IAS, NITI Aayog staffers, World Bank or IMF staffers, India-specific VC/PE, or India specific think tanks.

Edit: can't reply

> why is the academic work being done in Indian institutions so inaccessible in the US and the rest of the anglosphere

Because they publish in Economics journals and work on Political Economy, not "History".

It's the same with China scholars - the best ones are economists and are quantitative in nature.

Turns out the skills needed to understand the political economy of the Bengal Subah or the incentive structures of coinage reform in Qing China are also useful to craft economic policy for contemporary countries.

Why work in underfunded and frankly low impact history when you can actually affect change (and make good money and a career) in the various applications of Econ.

Panipat: The Rise of the Mughals